True or False: New evidence can be introduced when a Higher Level Review (HLR) is elected.

Prepare for the CDVA Accreditation Exam. Utilize flashcards and multiple-choice questions with hints and detailed explanations to increase your readiness for the exam. Aim for success with thorough preparation!

When a Higher Level Review (HLR) is requested, the process is specifically designed to allow for a fresh look at the existing evidence in the claims file, rather than permitting the introduction of new evidence. This is based on the premise that the HLR aims to evaluate the prior decision made by the Regional Office based solely on the evidence that was originally available at the time of that decision.

The HLR essentially provides veterans an opportunity to have their cases reassessed without reopening the claim for new information. This uniqueness of the HLR process is critical, as it ensures that decisions are made based on consistent and previously established evidence, allowing for a review of policy application and error of fact in the initial decision.

Therefore, the statement is false, as introducing new evidence is not permitted during the HLR process. This maintains consistency and fairness in the evaluation of claims.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy